OPTION A: Krashen 's Theory of Language Acquisition in my School District The Chicago Public Schools district, in which I work, offers a program for English Language learners with the goal to help students become proficient in the English language. VCE Study Guides ; Find a Bookseller ; Please login to system to use all resources. Language Analysis: The Perfect Essay Structure By Lauren White in Study 12th of May Finally, there’s the conclusion of your Language Analysis essay. Much like the intro, it is a structural requirement meaning you should write one if you don’t. Mar 02, · Nor does VCAA endorse or make any warranties regarding the study resources available on this site or sold by InStudent Media Pty Ltd or InStudent Publishing Pty Ltd. VCE Study Designs and related content can be accessed directly at the VCAA website. 🎥 How to achieve A+ in Language Analysis online course Subscribe to Lisa's Study Guides to get inspired by new videos weekly! Why using big words in VCE essays can make you look dumber. You will become a better VCE English language analysis student! Requirements particularly through my website Lisa's Study Guides, leading to my unique and comprehensive understanding of the course. + – Sample Language Analysis essays (single article) 2 lectures You will only know how to approach Language Analysis the A+ way if.
AND the advice you get from your teachers may not align with what the assessors expect of you. This guide is to help you prepare for the big end-of-year task! How is language used to persuade the audience?
That is what your whole piece should be geared towards. Not how many techniques you can find. Not how many quotes you can cram into your paragraphs.
So long as your essays are addressing that core question, everything else is secondary. For more on the different requirements in Language Analysis, scroll down to the end of this article for a complete checklist! Introductions Any introduction you write is going to be pretty important. Good Language Analysis introductions will usually be pretty straightforward.
Search the forums now!
From there, you can outline the main contention, as well as the arguments of any accompanying written or visual material. Consider the following introduction for the VCAA exam: Notice that this intro has focused more so on the contentions of the two written pieces and has only really addressed the visuals in that final sentence?
This is where the vast majority of your marks are decided, and no matter how delightful your intros and conclusions are, the body paragraphs are your biggest priorities. There are many different ways to analyse the material, and it will depend on the kind of content you get given in the exam.
But the way you format your analysis is also a pretty significant factor. The most common strategy is to structure things chronologically meaning you just start analysing the beginning of the material and go on till you get to the end and run out of stuff to say. You can essentially just read through the material once or twice and begin analysing straight away.
How do you do that? And at the end of each paragraph, you can link these sub-arguments to the overall contention of the author.
Whilst you may not be able to predict what the exam material will look like, there are a couple of things we can safely assume. The material will be based on the same subject matter, even if the contentions of written pieces differ.
Our sub-argument approach from above still works for comparative material! But this time, you will spend time on both pieces within the same paragraph.
For instance, in your first paragraph, you would discuss how the first author depicts New Zealand as a wonderful island paradise. I have never been to New Zealand.
If you were given something like the exam, you might have: See how that transition sentence made the connection between these two pieces nice and clear? This is all the comparison you need! Just find a point of similarity or difference between them, and do a quick and simple transition within one of your body paragraphs.
Provided you can wrap things up nicely and make a good final impression, you should be fine.
If possible, try and say something about how language has been used overall, or comment on a major appeal or big technique that the author uses. Otherwise, just build your way back out to the overall contentions, and make a brief statement or two about how the author wants the audience to respond. Instead, focus on the broad intentions of the author, and the way they are positioning the audience.