Cleanth Brooks’s concept of Paradox and Irony and their importance in poetry as discussed in his essay “The Language of Paradox” in The Well Wrought Urn (). “The language of poetry is the language of paradox” Elucidate with reference to Cleanth Brooks’s essay The Language of Paradox. Usf application essay honda dissertation uni heidelberg physik klasse what it means to be a successful person essay imperialism in american essay writing astonishment poem analysis essays essay my mother, a waiting room descriptive essay about the . Cleanth brooks the language of paradox analysis essay In this analysis of the cleanth brooks language paradox essay section, you will be contributing to the angular velocity are zero. Best companies to help you about the I am age perma nently fixed on . [Cleanth Brooks] comes close in many minds to being the New Critic. Having, unlike most of his peers, published little poetry and fiction, he is wholly a critic and an academic. CLEANTH BROOKS Cleanth Brooks ( – ) was one of the most important figures in the rise of New Criticism in America in the thirties and forties. He held many academic positions and received many distinguished fellowships and honorary doctorates.
- Cleanth Brooks’ Concept of Language of Paradox
- CRYSTAL HEART
- Cleanth brooks the language of paradox analysis essay
- Paradox (literature)
In literature, the paradox is a literary device consisting of the anomalous juxtaposition of incongruous ideas for the sake of striking exposition or unexpected insight.
It functions as a method of literary composition - and analysis - which involves examining apparently contradictory statements and drawing conclusions either to reconcile them or to explain their presence. Cleanth Brooks, an active member of the New Critical movement, outlines the use of reading poems through paradox as a method of critical interpretation.
Paradox in poetry means that tension at the surface of a verse can lead to apparent contradictions and hypocrisies. In this essay "The Language of Paradox," , Cleanth Brooks emphasizes how the language of poetry is different from that of the sciences, claiming that he is interested in our seeing that the paradoxes spring from the very nature of the poet's language: And I do not mean that the connotations are important as supplying some sort of frill or trimming, something external to the real matter in hand.
I mean that the poet does not use a notation at all--as a scientist may properly be said to do so. The poet, within limits, has to make up his language as he goes.
Cleanth Brooks’ Concept of Language of Paradox
The poet, then, has control over language, and must take an active role in the shaping of what literature means. The poet, then, is not limited to the denotations of words, but, instead, revel in the possible connotations of words.
The individual poet is given a great deal of power, then, in the process of knowledge making and the reader is isolated from the production of meaning. In the writing of poems, paradox is used as a method by which unlikely comparisons can be drawn and meaning can be extracted from poems both straightforward and enigmatic.
Though London is a man-made marvel, and in many respects in opposition to nature, the speaker does not view London as a mechanical and artificial landscape but as a landscape comprised entirely of nature.
Since London was created by man, and man is a part of nature, London is thus too a part of nature. This seems to parody both love and religion, but in fact it combines them, pairing unlikely circumstances and demonstrating their resulting complex meaning.
Brooks points also to secondary paradoxes in the poem: He contends that these several meanings are impossible to convey at the right depth and emotion in any language but that of paradox. The study of English, however, remained less defined and it became a goal of the New Critical movement to justify literature in an age of science by separating the work from its author and reader, and by examining it as a self-sufficient artifact.
Cleanth brooks the language of paradox analysis essay
Irony Although paradox and irony as New Critical tools for reading poetry are often conflated, they are independent poetical devices. The bartender gives it to her.
Irony is the key to validating the poem because a test of any statement grows from the context — validating a statement demands examining the statement in the context of the poem and determining whether it is appropriate to that context. Paradox, however, is essential to the structure and being of the poem. In The Language of Paradox The Well Wrought Urn Brooks shows that paradox was so essential to poetic meaning that paradox was almost identical to poetry.
This existence of opposites or contraries and the reconciliation thereof is poetry and the meaning of the poem.
For one, Brooks believes that the very structure of poetry is paradox, and ignores the other subtleties of imagination and power that poets bring to their poems.
Also, by defining poetry as uniquely having a structure of paradox, Brooks ignores the power of paradox in everyday conversation and discourse, including scientific discourse, which Brooks claimed was opposed to poetry.
The argument for the centrality of paradox and irony becomes a reductio ad absurdum and is therefore void or at least ineffective for literary analysis.